Readers of Young Workers Movement likely already know the answer to that question: the rising cost of higher education, combined with a labor market that values that high-priced education possibly regardless of quality.
However, Ron Lieber in a New York Times’ column last week placed the blame with students for failing to properly consider the cost of college when enrolling and their colleges for failing to counsel them. His argument is that smart students and their parents should better assess what taking out substantial student loans will mean to their future financial situation. Fair enough. $100,000 in student loan debt – which is nearly impossible to default on in bankruptcy court – should set-off some alarm bells. But that’s your #1, top-pick choice of school, that is both academically stimulating and socially engaging, money seems not to matter. Besides, society tells you to go to the best college you can get into, and, as a general trend, the higher ranked schools cost more.
Lieber also argues college admissions counselors should talk with students about their ability to afford the school, which might bring them back to reality. There is a reason college admissions counselors do not look at financial statements – having nothing to do with the awkward inappropriateness of that conversation, which Lieber dismisses. Admissions departments do not have financial information because it could then potentially be used in determining enrollment. How could schools then be prevented from only choose the rich kids so as to avoid enrolling anyone that would need financial aid? There are already too many challenges facing low-income students, having to convince admissions counselors that spending a few financial aid dollars on them is a good investment, shouldn’t be a part of the equation.
So what do we need to do? We need to change the system. The federal government’s transformation of the student financial loan system is a great first step, as it will increase the value of federal aid and stop paying big banks what the government could do itself. The financial reform bill in conference right now is also a great step, as it will put some oversight over the big banks dolling out private loans.
The answer is taking the cost out of college. Imagine a system of higher education where money does not determine if or where you enroll, does not drive the quality of the education nor does it harm your ability to be a self-sustainable, financially-sound young worker when you graduate. Rather than continue to subsidize the cost of college through grants and loans, the federal government should look to subsidize the cost of college by giving those grants to the colleges directly. Invest directly in the schools, not the students. The status quo allows for the cost spiral to continue escalating upwards without breakers. The closest thing we have in the US to this system is the public college system of state and community facilities of higher education, but it is under attack by budget cuts. Change of this magnitude will be difficult to come because of the degree of corporatization of higher education, but in the meantime blaming the students won’t help. Blame the system they are caught up in.



