Archive | Report/Data RSS feed for this section

Need for Academic Student Employee Unions

28 Jul

The purpose of academic student employee unions was made clear in a report released earlier this month by the University of California on how the system is meeting the needs of graduate students.  The report shows that the system’s stipends are clearly out of touch with the living expenses, requiring many to get second jobs outside of their work for the university.  Because of the financial burden, even though the UC system is very selective in who it admits, enrollment is actually lower than peer institutions – meaning that highly talented academic student employees are turning away because they will not be compensated justly.  Its clear that the university needs to adjust its compensation before it will lose its reputation for top doctoral programs.

Inside HigherEd’s story on the report is below, but the key point that they do not emphasize is that is UAW 2865, which represents over 12,000 Readers, Tutors, TAs, and others at the University of California, that is fighting to end the budget cuts that have increased class sizes and the burden on teaching assistants.  Its UAW 2865 that is fighting for higher stipends so academic student employees can afford basic expenses like housing.  Its UAW 2865 that is trying to ensure the best graduate students not just get accepted, but actually enroll.  Its academic student employee unions that maintain those good reputations by finding ways to make universities work both for their own academic pursuits and for the undergraduates that they help.

Money Matters

July 27, 2010

The University of California campuses are known for top doctoral programs, but two new reports on graduate students suggest that the state’s financial problems are posing dangers to that reputation.

A new report from the university system shows that graduate students are unhappy with housing affordability, the amount of financial support the university provides, and the support’s type and duration.

The report found that graduate-student stipends increased at the system’s universities from 2004 to 2007, with the biggest jumps at Santa Cruz, Santa Barbara, Berkeley and UCLA. Nonetheless, in 2007, the stipends netted about $1,000 less than at students’ top-choice universities outside the system — a factor that may play a role in where students decide to enroll. The University of California has a selective admission rate of 19 percent, compared to 32 percent at peer institutions, but an average yield of 43 percent, compared to an average of 57 percent at other universities.

“Our stipends are quite low compared to the cost of living,” said Steven Beckwith, UC vice president for research and graduate studies. “I don’t know if we can do much about it in the current budget climate, but it remains a long-term goal.”

Berkeley graduate students receive about $16,000 a year after tuition is remitted. “Stanford graduate students get twice that,” said Jessica Taal, Berkeley unit chair for UAW Local 2865, which represents academic student employees, including teaching assistants. “Almost everyone I know at Berkeley has to get money in another way – outside fellowships, working, freelancing, dog-walking, whatever it takes.”

Another study released this year measured graduate student satisfaction at Berkeley. Among its findings were data showing that students who rely most on student loans were affected most by recent budget cuts. Additionally, support for graduate student parents – about 10 percent of the population – is viewed as inadequate, and about 30 percent of survey respondents have difficulty finding appropriate and affordable housing.

Taal said that an average one-bedroom apartment around Berkeley costs $1,400 a month, and that housing is simply not affordable. She is currently not enrolled — for financial reasons.

Beckwith, however, said that the university graduate students are in pretty good shape. “It isn’t a lucrative life, but it’s a perfectly adequate life for taking care of your basic needs, being able to focus on research, improvement and study,” he said. “The amount of money is not the primary consideration – the first consideration is the quality of the institution and the quality of the faculty.”

Students who took the Berkeley survey mentioned other noticeable changes due to budget cuts. Class sizes are bigger, creating a larger workload for teaching assistants and less faculty attention for the undergraduates.

The system report concludes that more funding is required to continue to attract the highest-quality graduate students. Students in physical, life, and computer sciences, as well as engineering, are most likely to receive outside grants and fellowships, but students in the humanities and social sciences rely most on university funds. More sources of internal funding will have to be identified to support them, the report states.

Young Union Women: Labor Movement at “Tipping Point”

16 Jul

Earlier this week The Berger-Marks Foundation released a report, “Stepping Up, Stepping Back: Women Activists ‘Talk Union’ Across Generations“, based on a gathering they held in March with 30 women social justice activists.  The group, half under 35 and half older than 35, and representing over 25 unions and solidarity organizations, spent two full days analyzing their experiences in the labor movement.

What they found was that although unions have made significant strides over the generations, unions are still not fully responding to the needs of younger women.  The labor movement is at a “tipping point”, where if unions do not reform NOW they will lose the next generation of activists.  Women cited too few leadership opportunities, little mentoring and a disregard for the need to have a work-life balance as examples of ways they are being driven out.  Additionally, the under-35 folks worried that seasoned members spend too much time focused on the technology they use to talk with younger workers and not enough time thinking about the message.  They want real connections, not facebook messages and tweets.

Based on these concerns, the group came up with a series of important recommendations:

  • Create “safe spaces” for women and younger activists.
  • Eradicate sexual harassment and sexism.
  • Reach out to young workers and activists by providing opportunities for interaction that don’t rely on social networking or other technology.
  • Adopt a more feminist agenda through sustained partnerships with women’s organizations.
  • Establish formal mentoring programs specifically for younger women.
  • Fund education and training programs to assist younger activists so they can “talk union” with their peers.
  • Adopt term limits for top elected union offices.
  • Expand the number of seats on union governing boards (to allow more opportunities for women, minorities and young folks without threatening incumbents).
  • Include younger workers in real decision-making and let them take responsibility for important projects.
  • Make union events meaningful… and fun.

A story featured in the report’s introduction really sums up what is needed in the labor movement as a whole: during the first three sessions, the older women led, taught, and guided the discussion, and then, during the final session, the younger women stepped up and the older women stepped back.  This wasn’t done on purpose or by any sort of conference rule, but done naturally.  What these recommendations lay out is a way to help this natural process occur in the labor movement as a whole.  Lets hope unions take notice and implement before the dire predictions of “tipping points” actually tip.

What Research Tells Us About Young Workers in Unions

12 Jul

Following Friday’s post, Young Workers’ Characteristics Require Union Reform, which detailed the challenges unions face as younger members enter the workforce with their own perspectives and attitudes.  Today’s post looks at what glimmers of opportunity for unions the research points out.

Drawing on the body of existing research on millennials in the workplace, Karen K. Myers and Kamyab Sadaghiani in Millennials in the Workplace: A Communication Perspective on Millennials’ Organizational Relationships and Performance explain what they believe is a liability for young workers: their preference for working in groups.  While favoring group decision-making might be a bad thing in the workplace, its a great thing for potential union activists.  Millennials’ preference for groups might be due in part to the heavy emphasis schools placed on group-based learning while they were growing up.  It is also a reflection of changes in social dynamics, think of the way millennials prefer to “date” in groups.  Groups can be difficult in the workplace because they are slow-moving, might impede creativity, and can be manipulated by powerful members.  We have certainly seen these effects with unions.  However, since young workers prefer evaluations based on outcomes rather than age, tenure, or experience, they will likely not stand for the negative forces that can diminish the work quality of groups.  And given that millennials “are impatient about becoming recognized as valuable contributors”, they will quickly be pushing team-based unions to innovate.  So what can unions do to take advantage of young workers unique ability to improve unions through their commitment and experience?  Invite young workers into the group-based decision processes of the union, ask them for their thoughts and to contribute to making the union better.

Another advantage for unions from millennials joining the ranks is the opportunity to expand their technological capabilities.  Young workers are the first generation to grow up with household computers and spend more time using digital media than any other age group, according to Pew Research.  Some have suggested that young workers have an opportunity to be “employee lead users” of communication/information technologies in the workplace, essentially meaning that they will drive their workplaces to digitalize.  There is no reason why they could not also do this in their union.  Young workers can help their locals go online by creating websites, facebook pages, and even teaching older members simply how to send a txt message.  What can unions do to facilitate this?  Just ask young members to take on this task.  This could be a great way for younger members to make that valuable contribution to the group.

So while young workers entering the workplace has some significant risks for the role of unions and the way they interact with their members, young workers also bring a lot to the table.  Most importantly they bring an appreciation for working together, the most basic virtue of a union.  Clearly, young workers have the ability to rebuild the labor movement and make it more relevant to today.  Let’s just make sure they have the opportunity.

Young Workers’ Characteristics Require Union Reform

9 Jul

The attitudes of millennials in the workplace will inevitably determine how relevant and attractive they view unions.  In today’s post, I review some of the challenges unions face with young workers: reliance on seniority and changes in labor-management relationships.  In Monday’s post, I will review some of the opportunities unions have in engaging young workers, particularly their favoring of collaborative and egalitarian work environments.

Calling the young folks entering (or trying to enter) the labor market unprepared, recent news reports and “studies” have stereotyped young workers as unmotivated and self-centered.  (See the self-serving report from York College’s Center for Professional Excellence to get a full sense of the criticisms.)  Often this sentiment has seeped into the way more seasoned union leadership see new additions to the workplace.  But a review of more scientific literature  reveals particular insights for these leaders on how to best engage young union members.

In an overview of the popular literature and research on millennials organizational relationships in the recent edition of the Journal of Business and Psychology, Karen K. Myers and Kamyab Sadaghiani reveal an important difference that presents a particular challenge for unions: the sense among older workers that newbies need to “pay their dues”.  Boomers put a significant emphasis on “career” formation and building.  And while the idea of a company job is largely just a memory for many,  it is still embedded in one of the cores of unionism: seniority based on time with the organization.  However, the current high-level of young worker mobility is not conducive to climbing seniority ladders.  (Check out the Freelancers Union for more on how unions need to change to accommodate the new work environment.)  Changes in the nature of work, and the over-confidence that many millennials have from being over-nurtured, inspires young workers to ask to be involved in significant projects early on and to be hurt when not consulted on important decisions.  Within the union context, providing opportunities for young workers to take some responsibility and have a sense of ownership is clearly important.  Of course, taking a look at ways to measure seniority to reflect the new realities of the labor market would also be helpful.

Another challenge, but a related one, is that young workers expect to have a closer relationship with their boss.  In some industries, like in the building trades, unions and management see each other for the most part as in this together.  However, generally in the union context, management is the enemy.  Young  workers may not be as motivated by the same adversarial messages as older workers; and may be more forgiving of mismanagement – or timid to risk their personal relationship.  I have certainly heard my fair share of older members say that the new folks think “management gave them everything” – well thats a symptom of young workers looking for workplace parents.  Millennials are looking for their workplace parents to give them the same kind of compliments that their parents gave them growing up.  (In a guide to managing young workers, AllBusiness advises: “younger employees require a lot of attention and feedback, demanding more of a time commitment.”)  So what can unions do?  Mentor, mentor, mentor.  If young workers are looking for workplace parents, union leaders should fill that role – don’t let the management do it.  Also, within that context, give them the structure and positive feedback they need to stay motivated.

Most importantly, these challenges make clear that seasoned members need to be more open to understanding the characteristics of younger workers and the next generation of leaders need to be more patient in understanding the perspectives of older members.

American Dream Elusive for Young Workers Before Recession

8 Jul

Yesterday the New York Times ran a front page article, A New Generation, an Elusive American Dream, on how the recession has made the American Dream unattainable for many young folks.  It’s a must-read article, however, it missed the long-term trends that have been exacerbated by the recession: youth unemployment and decline in quality of jobs.

Taking the story of Scott Nicholson, a Colgate University graduate, who is living off his parents while he optimistically searches for a job, the Times’ story generalizes:

Starved for jobs at adequate pay, the millennials tend to seek refuge in college and in the military and to put off marriage and child-bearing.  Those who are working often stay with the jobs they have rather than jump to better paying but less secure ones, as young people seeking advancement normally do.  And they are increasingly willing to forgo raises, or to settle for small ones.

All true, but these trends were already occurring in response to a difficult labor market for young workers.  Businesses have been retaining older workers and not hiring young workers since the recession of 2001.  According to a working paper, Out With the Young and In With the Old: U.S. Labor Markets 2000-2008 and the Case for An Immediate Jobs Creation Program for Teens and Young Adults, by the Center for Labor Market Studies at Northeastern University, from 2000 to 2008, the employment rates of each age group below 35 declined sharply with the most significant decline in teenage employment.  Over the same time, older workers employment rate increased 4.6 points for 55-64 year olds and 4 points for 65+.

But its not just employment figures that matter, its also the quality of the jobs.  Pay and employer-provided benefits for young workers has stagnated.  Wages for 18 to 29 year olds was 10 percent lower in 2007 than in 1979.  According to a report by the Center for Economic and Policy Research, Unions and Upward Mobility for Young Workers, the decline in union density has had a significant effect in diminishing the quality of jobs available to young workers.  Unions boost wages for young workers by $1.75/hour on average and significantly increase the prospects of health insurance coverage (by 17%) and retirement security (by 24%).

However, the trend has been away from unions – not towards them.  Meaning there has been a real decline in the quality of jobs young workers have available to them.

Scott Nicholson has the bad luck to graduate into a recession, yes, but the opportunities available to his grandfather (a retired stockbroker) and his father (a tool manufacturer) might never have been available to him at least not in the ways this relatives fell into them.  Young workers have been hardest hit by this recession (as they have been in every post-WWII recession), but its these long-term structural problems that need to be addressed.  The standard, slow job growth won’t dig young workers out.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 34 other followers